Statement re: The Big Bang, Genesis, and Knocking on Heaven's Door
(re: A poster presentation to be presented on April 1 at the 2012 American Physical Society meeting in Atlanta)
In my April 1 APS poster at the Hyatt Regency, I, physicist
Robert Gentry, am set to announce game-changing discoveries
of fatal flaws in the astrophysical and geological foundational
assumptions that support big bang cosmology. In a real sense
this is not surprising given that neither physicists nor geologists
have done what is the essence of scientific protocol:
testing and validating a theory's central assumptions before
that theory is presented to the public and the wider scientific
community as a viable and trustworthy scientific theory.
The utter failure of physicists and geologists to do this testing
is one of the greatest debacles in the history of modern science,
but yet one that has been generally unknown until the time of
this APS meeting. To top it off I will present primordial radioactivity
evidence supporting the rapidity of the literal Genesis creation.
Thus avowed atheist evolutionists, Stephen "No God" Hawking
and Richard "The God Delusion" Dawkins, may well have conniptions
when they learn of Gentry's pro-God-of-Genesis scientific presentation,
The Big Bang, Genesis, and Knocking on Heaven's Door, at the
forthcoming American Physical Society meeting in Atlanta, on
Sunday afternoon April 1 at the Hyatt Regency.
There I will report that there can be no greater flaw found in
any cosmological theory than for it now to be reported — just
as Copernicus did for Ptolemaic cosmology — that big bang's foundational
postulate of spacetime expansion redshifts is irrefutably false
and contradicted by GPS experimental results. Since big bang's
explanations of Hubble's redshift relation, and the 2.73 K Cosmic
Blackbody Radiation (CBR) as expansion-redshifted radiation,
are critically hinged on this assumption, then its disproof
means that the big bang collapses as quickly as did Ptolemaic cosmology
when Copernicus discovered that its foundational earth-centered assumption
was sun-centered instead.
I will also report another discovery that is equally destructive
to big bang's second foundational assumption, which is that all
the universe's primordial radioactivity and its heavy elements
— including those that compose all of Earth's rocks — can be
traced to ancient supernovae nucleosynthesis events.
Big bang theory holds that these nucleosynthesis events
generally occurred millions to hundreds of millions ago or more,
which in turn means that only the primordial radioactive elements
with exceedingly long half-lives could have survived such long
intervals to be incorporated into the cooling magma of Earth's
first rocks. But during my 13-year long Guest Scientist stay
at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory I repeatedly published evidence
that falsifies this scenario in my 1970's Nature and Science
reports, especially those in 1974 — see
Here I refer to my discovery of three types of microscopic
petroglyphs in granite rocks worldwide, with El Capitan being
an example of such rocks. I determined that these petroglyphs had
been produced by different-energy alpha particles emitted from
a tiny center, and that their differing ring sizes could be identified
with radioactive decay of three isotopes of polonium: 210Po,
214Po and 218Po. The accompanying slide shows several three-ring
218Po halos, so named because the initiating polonium isotope
was 218Po (middle ring), which decayed to 214Po (outer ring)
and then to 210Po (inner ring).
Since my peer-reviewed Science and Nature reports proved that
the polonium atoms that formed these halos were primordial —
completely disconnected from those originating with uranium decay
chain radioactivity such as in the U-rich Colorado Plateau sedimentary
formations — then their short half-lives constrain the time
period from primordial polonium creation to creation of earth's
foundational granite rocks, and by extension, the Earth itself.
For the 218Po halos that period is only its 3-minute half-life.
Because these primordial Po halos are part of our galaxy's
primordial matter, this also constrains the elapsed time interval
for the creation of the primordial matter which now composes
the stars and galaxies — and in fact all the planetary systems
throughout the visible cosmos — to the same 3-minute interval.
Such evidence disproves big bang's foundational assumption of
an eons-long, slow accumulation of primordial matter in repeated
supernovae nucleosynthesis events throughout the universe, and
instead provides a scientific affirmation of the rapidity of
the Genesis, literal, six-day record of creation of the visible
cosmos, including, of course, our galaxy and solar system.
This is scientific proof not only of Genesis but also of the
existence of the Creator God of Genesis. And it has all been published
in the world's premier scientific journals without refutation
for the past thirty years, during which time it has been heavily
censored from coming to the center of scientific attention by
certain strong evolutionists within and without the APS.
This is part one of The Big Bang's Cosmic Titanic, and Judgment
Day for the Worldwide Physics Community, because this community
must now answer to the general public first why, during the
last three decades, eminent physicists in editorial positions,
as well as those in regular APS membership, have been content
to bury both this scientific disproof of big bang's
ages long, heavy element nulceosynthesis scenario, as well as
to censor its support for the nucleogenesis of the Genesis Creation
The second part of this Cosmic Titanic, and Judgment Day for the Worldwide
Physics Community is that it unveils one of the greatest debacles
in modern times — the one that duped the general public into
believing that the big bang is one of the greatest discoveries of
all time, while at the same time cosmologists were well aware
that not a single paper had ever been published confirming its
central assumptions. And moreover, when I repeatedly attempted
to have this failure and my discoveries of its downfall brought
to the center of scientific attention for analysis and discussion
over the last two decades — with the one exception being my
first paper being published in MPLA in 1997 — editors in elite
physics journals have repeatedly censored further advances in
my discoveries all the while allowing criticisms to be published.
The most egregious occurrence of this censorship began when
the ten papers I submitted to the arXiv in February 2001 were
deleted by Los Alamos arXiv staff that same evening, even after
receiving valid arXiv numbers, and hence were not published at
that time. A few days later I again submitted the same papers
titled, Flaws in the Big Bang Point to Genesis, A New Millennium
Model of the Cosmos to the Los Alamos arXiv. Again they received
arXiv numbers and again they were deleted. The difference on
this occasion was that Paul Ginsparg, who was the person at Los Alamos
who was in charge of the arXiv at that time, ordered that my password
be deleted as well. This was clearly an authoritarian decree that was
backed by the Director of Los Alamos National Laboratory and its
librarian — technically the arXiv was under the librarian. Later,
after the arXiv was moved to Cornell University under the auspices of
Paul Ginsparg, he continued to censor my papers from being released.
The president of Cornell, as well as its librarian, were both made
aware of this censorship but opted to do nothing. All this has of
course made it impossible for me to post further confirmation of my
results of big bang's disproof on the arXiv. Reports of this censorship
then appeared in three news items in Nature over the next
several years as I unsuccessfully attempted through the courts to
again regain my password.
Of course these Nature news items afforded wide opportunity
for anyone in the worldwide physics community to protest that
such actions were exactly the same as the ultimate manifestation
of censorship by totalitarian rulers, and that fairness demanded
that my results be brought to the center of scientific attention
for analysis and discussion. This would be in accord with the National
Academy of Sciences's 1976 "An Affirmation of Freedom of Inquiry and Expression," which
states in part:
… That the search for knowledge and understanding of the physical universe … should
be conducted under conditions of intellectual freedom, without
religious, political or ideological restriction.
… That all discoveries should be disseminated and may be challenged without such restriction.
… That freedom of inquiry and dissemination of ideas require that those so engaged
be free to search where their inquiry leads … free to publish
their findings without political censorship and without fear
of retribution in consequence of unpopularity of their conclusions.
Those who challenge existing theory must be protected from retaliatory reactions.
… That the preservation and extension of personal freedom are dependent
on all of us … supporting and working for application of the principles enunciated in the
United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and upholding a universal
belief in the worth and dignity of each human being.
Nevertheless, just the opposite of the NAS affirmation of
freedom to publish and disseminate my discoveries has occurred
due to continuing efforts by evolutionists in the APS to censor
my results from publication in physics and other journals.
It's the ultimate Watergate-type scientific cover-up.
Many details of this suppression and cover-up, with copies
of the ten papers, can be found at www.theorionfoundation.com. The bottom
line is that many physicists have worked hard — and are still
working hard — to suppress and cover up my results of the collapse
of Big Bang Cosmology and the emergence of the new COSMIC CENTER
UNIVERSE model that points to the Throne of God at the nearby
Center of the Universe. The technical details of this model
can be found in CERN Preprints, Ext-2003-021
a Major Contradiction in Big Bang Cosmology Points to the New
Cosmic Center Universe Model") and Ext-2003-022
Cosmic Center Universe Model Matches Eight of Big Bang's
Major Predictions Without the F-L Paradigm.") It is yet to be
seen whether protests to CERN about my APS presentation will
result in these papers being removed from the CERN collection.
The evidence as I see it is that highly regarded, confirmed
evolutionists in the physics community are committed to whatever
it takes — including involving themselves in a continuing, giant
Watergate-type cover-up — to prevent the general public from
learning that there is genuine scientific evidence that overthrows
the big bang, which at the same time provides a very clear scientific
basis for the literal six-day Genesis creation account, and hence
also for the existence of God.
On another issue, just think of the huge outcry that is almost
certain to follow once conservative Christian parents realize that
they have been forced to send their children to public schools
to learn about evolution under atheistic evolutionists' insistence
that the big bang was scientific truth, only to now learn that
for more than seventy years they have been duped into believing
a huge lie, a lie that in many instances led to destruction of
their children's faith in God and ended in their becoming atheistic
evolutionists like their teachers.
In an attempt to break through this censorship that is preventing
me from further publication of the falsification of the big bang
and Earth's ancient geological evolution, I have on two occasions
contacted three of America's leading evolutionists — Bruce Alberts,
Jr., editor of Science; Ralph Cicerone, National Academy of Sciences
President, and Eugenie Scott, director of the pro-evolution National
Center of Science Education — which is dedicated to propagating
evolution and opposing the public school teaching of creation
— for each of them to pick a leading cosmologist to meet with
them and me on a live, nationwide TV forum to settle the big
bang evolution / Genesis issue.
The offer still stands for any three renowned big bang cosmologists
who wish to take up the offer. It also stands for any three highly
placed geologists who would also wish to be included on the forum
discussion to refute the primordial polonium halo evidence that
identifies granites as Earth's Genesis rocks, rather than being
of natural origin from slow cooling of magma. To settle whether
granite is of natural origin, as geologists have insisted for
about two centuries, I have challenged geologists everywhere
to synthesize just a small hand-sized piece of granite in the
lab to prove that it is of natural origin.
This issue came into prime focus during my presentation at
the University of Tennessee at Knoxville on April 13, 1987. As
the video of that presentation clearly shows — see
— a UT geology professor claimed publicly that evening that
he knew of many publications that showed that granite had been synthesized
and I was ignorant for not knowing this, and then claimed to
be able to synthesize a walnut-size piece of granite himself
in a just a week. I then stated before the large audience that
evening that my phone number would be given and that he should
call me so that his success could be announced on local, state
and national news that he had been able to do that which no other
geologist had ever done. Twenty five years have elapsed since
his claim to be able to synthesize granite in a week was made,
and it has never occurred. Neither have I ever received a list
of any of the publications that he claimed showed that granites
had already been synthesized in the lab.
A few years earlier, in testimony at the 1981 Arkansas creation-evolution
trial, G. Brent Dalrymple, then Acting Director of the USGS in
Menlo Park, was called by the ACLU to provide some naturalistic
explanation for polonium halos in granites. Here's his trial
testimony response to the question of how the existence of polonium
halos in granites can be explained.
"And also in Gentry's work, he's proposed a very tiny mystery which
is balanced on the other side by an enormous amount of evidence.
And I think it's important to know what the answer to that little
mystery is. …
So that if you have a granitic body, a rock that comes from
the melt, that contains this mica, and it cools down, it takes
millions of years for a body like that to cool.
"So that by the time the body cooled, all the polonium would
have decayed, since it has an extremely short half-life. Therefore,
there would be no polonium in the body to cause the polonium halos.
"So what he [Gentry] is saying, this is primordial polonium;
therefore the granite mass in which it occurs could not have
cooled slowly; therefore, it must have been created by fiat, instantly."
Testimony of Dr. G. Brent Dalrymple, Acting Director, Western
Division, USGS, at the December 1981 Arkansas Creation Trial;
see Creation's Tiny Mystery
(Earth Science Associates, 2003) online at
www.halos.com. And as a most significant follow-up
to that testimony, Dalrymple — who in 2005 received the National
Medal of Science from President Bush — wrote the following
letters sent out under the auspices of the
pro-evolution National Center for Science Education,
Dear Fellow Geologist,
The [creation science] movement is beginning to affect some
college classes, too, as members of "Genesis clubs" enter classrooms
with disruptive (and difficult to answer) questions. How would
you answer a student who claims that the presence of Polonium
halos in granite demonstrates that granite had to have formed
suddenly (i.e., was specially created)?
All the above refutes Lisa Randall's argument — see "Knocking
on Heaven's Door," Science 334, 762 (2011) — against God's existence
by her claim that there is no "material trace of
his actions." In fact, as the above shows, the God
of Genesis did the exact opposite when He placed His Fingerprints
of Creation in Earth and cosmos, thus certifying the rapidity of His
instantaneous work during Genesis' six literal days of creation
(and also confirming His existence), while at the same
time decertifying all of evolution, including the big bang and
More details — including many of my scientific reports — are
given at www.halos.com.